Skip to content
DEEN

Compliance & Legal Checker

Cease-and-desist emergency mode: review a warning letter in a structured way

The check structures deadline, demands, preservation of evidence, injunction risks and immediate measures when a cease-and-desist letter, platform notice, authorisation inquiry, lawyer's demand or preliminary injunction has been received.

For companies and digital business models Prioritise deadlines and risks Create a short overview for your inquiry

Start check

Fast triage instead of a hasty reaction

The emergency mode helps to record the deadline, draft cease-and-desist declaration, payment demand, request for information, evidence, platform risks and business impact separately. Most importantly: do not sign a cease-and-desist declaration without review, do not lose evidence by deleting content and enter deadlines in the calendar immediately.

Emergency file

Deadline, demand and evidence as a dynamic situation report

The situation report shows a cease-and-desist file with a deadline bar, demand fields, evidence status and a risk meter. The display reacts to your answers in the questionnaire.

DEADLINE BAR Deadline still open Cease-and-desist file Review demands, evidence and response risks separately 1 Record the claim and practice area 2 Secure the deadline and draft declaration 3 Save evidence, screenshots and attachments 4 Control response, payment and deletion Risk meter 0 Assessment open Secure the deadline first
Orientation

Reviewing a cease-and-desist letter in order: from receipt to response

The most important steps should not be mixed up: first secure the deadline and demands, then document evidence, assess risks and prepare a controlled response.

1
Record deadline and receiptDocument the delivery method, date, time, the deadline set and internal forwarding.
2
Separate the demandsRecord injunctive relief, payment, information, deletion, platform measures or threatened court action separately.
3
Preserve evidenceSave the letter, attachments, affected URLs, screenshots, platform tickets, contracts and chains of title completely.
4
Review the injunction riskScope, contractual penalty, risk of repetition, technical feasibility and follow-up cases are often decisive.
5
Prepare the responseNo hasty signature, payment, disclosure or public communication without an agreed strategy.
Assessment

What this check does

The check helps to prepare the starting position so that deadline pressure, type of claim, state of evidence, business significance and next steps can be discussed in a structured way.

What is reviewed?
  • Type of claim: competition law, trademark law, copyright, data protection, platform, review, press, software, product law or a mixed case.
  • Demands: injunctive relief, declaration backed by a penalty, payment, information, deletion, takedown, blocking or court action.
  • Deadlines, receipt, previous reactions, preservation of evidence, similar content and economic impact.
  • Interfaces with e-commerce, IT contracts, data protection, AI, platform law, advertising law, product safety, NIS2, CRA and reputational risks.
When is the check relevant?
  • When a cease-and-desist letter, lawyer's demand, authorisation inquiry, platform notice or preliminary injunction has been received.
  • When a deadline is running or a cease-and-desist declaration, payment, information, deletion or account measure is demanded.
  • When you have already responded, deleted, signed, paid or communicated publicly.
  • When the same issue may affect several products, campaigns, domains, listings, images, texts, claims or customers.
What are the limits of the check?

The check does not replace a review of whether the claim is justified in the individual case. Especially with cease-and-desist declarations, contractual penalties, protective letters, platform procedures, data protection issues or urgent court proceedings, the exact wording, the evidence and the legal basis of the claim are decisive.

Questionnaire

Select your matter and prioritise the risk

Answer the following steps. At least one answer is required per step. The evaluation is then created automatically.

Step 1 of 60 %
Result

Evaluation of the review route

The result level is an initial orientation based on your answers. It does not conclusively state whether the asserted claims are justified. How we then review and defend against cease-and-desist letters is explained under Defending against a cease-and-desist letter; further background is available on our page on Competition law.

Assessment open0 / 100

Please complete the questionnaire

Once the questionnaire is completed, the likely assessment, risk level, priority, reasons, measures and typical documents appear.

Likely assessmentopen
Priorityopen
Next focusRecord the deadline and letter completely
Main problemopen

Reasons for the classification

  • The information is not yet complete.

Recommended next review points

  • Secure the deadline, letter and attachments.

Documents worth preparing

  • Cease-and-desist letter, attachments, screenshots, contracts and previous communication.
Deadlines and risks

Typical review matrix for cease-and-desist letters

The matrix shows typical points that should regularly be reviewed separately in cease-and-desist and urgent constellations.

Review fieldPriorityWhat mattersTypical immediate measure
Deadline and receiptimmediateDate, time, delivery method and calculation of the deadline influence the response strategy.Calendar the deadline, document receipt, secure the letter completely.
Cease-and-desist declarationcriticalScope, contractual penalty, core theory and risk of repetition can have long-term consequences.Do not sign without review; mark the draft separately.
Preservation of evidencehighBefore changes or deletion, content, URLs, screenshots, platform tickets and documents must be secured.Save evidence with date, context and the complete page state.
Payment and informationhighCease-and-desist costs, damages, licence analogy, information and rendering of accounts must be reviewed separately.Record the items claimed and the data requested in a structured way.
Platform and publiccase-dependentBlocking, takedown, loss of ranking, reviews, press and social media can be economically relevant.Secure account status, tickets, links, reach and the communication line.
Data protection and ITcase-dependentTracking, data flows, logs, security incidents, data subject rights or contact with the supervisory authority can trigger additional obligations.Review data types, systems, consent logs, DPA and security aspects.
Sensible next steps

Related ITMR checkers and follow-up reviews

Depending on the focus, an additional assessment may make sense, for example for e-commerce, reputation, documents, press communication or broader compliance exposure.

E-commerce cease-and-desist risk checkFor shops, price information, the button solution, cancellation button, withdrawal, reviews and typical competition risks.→ Review and defamation checkWhen reviews, platform notices, factual claims or reputational risks are in the foreground.→ Press and communication checkFor public communication, press inquiries, counter-statements, injunctive relief and the communication line.→ Mandate navigatorWhen it first needs to be clarified which approach, which documents and which priority make sense.→ Document dossier builderFor an orderly compilation of letters, attachments, screenshots, contracts, deadlines and evidence.→ Compliance RadarFor a broader review of whether further data protection, platform, IT or advertising risks follow from the cease-and-desist case.→
Short overview

Short overview for your inquiry

The short overview is generated automatically from your answers and can be copied into the contact request.

Submit deadline, letter and evidence in an orderly way

When contacting us, state directly the deadline, the date of receipt, the declarations demanded and whether anything has already been signed, paid, deleted or answered.

Note on the assessment: The check serves as an initial orientation. The specific legal assessment depends on the facts, deadlines, data flows, contractual situation, countries, target groups and technical implementation.