Platform liability check
Assess the DSA, moderation and liability risks of your platform
This interactive check helps platform operators, marketplaces, communities, review portals, SaaS offerings with user content and digital services with an initial assessment of platform liability, notice-and-action, moderation decisions, marketplace duties, reputational risks and DSA compliance. The result shows where the liability risks for your platform are greatest, so you can review your platform's DSA risks early.
What the check is for
The check structures typical platform cases: illegal content, counterfeit products, reviews, suspensions, complaint processes, trader traceability, automated moderation, protection of minors and acute escalations by authorities, courts or cease-and-desist letters.
- Preliminary assessment of the service role and risk level.
- Prioritised review points for DSA, content, marketplace and litigation risks.
- Copyable short overview for an inquiry to ITMR.
Interactive orientation
DSA liability gate: where does pressure to act arise?
The display condenses your answers into five review zones while you complete the questionnaire. The fuller a zone, the more it should be prioritised legally.
Review logic
Typical review sequence for platform liability
Determine the service role
Distinguish between intermediary service, hosting service, online platform, online marketplace and editorial offering.
Secure the trigger
Document the notice, URL, content, product listing, user account, decision, deadline and previous communication.
Review process duties
Compare point of contact, notice channel, statement of reasons, complaints, transparency report, trusted flagger and misuse processes.
Delimit marketplace risks
For business sellers, also include trader traceability, product safety, fakes, GPSR and consumer information.
Prioritise the response
For deadlines, authorities, courts, press or repeat cases, coordinate evidence preservation, response strategy and communication.
Assessment
What this check does
The platform liability check does not replace a legal review of the individual case. It does, however, help to record the most important risk signals in an orderly way and to prepare typical follow-up reviews.
Which platforms are typically affected?
Affected may be hosting services, online platforms, marketplaces, communities, review portals, social features, SaaS offerings with uploads, creator offerings and services where users provide content, profiles, listings, reviews or products.
Which DSA duties may be relevant?
Depending on the role, points of contact, terms transparency on moderation, notice-and-action, statements of reasons for moderation decisions, internal complaint handling, transparency reports, trusted flagger processes, measures against misuse, advertising and ranking transparency and marketplace duties may apply. The DSA has applied generally since 17 February 2024.
Why are marketplaces particularly critical?
In addition to DSA duties, online marketplaces may face further risks from product safety, consumer law, product information, fake listings, trader identity and recall processes. Since 13 December 2024, the GPSR for consumer products and online marketplaces has also been an important review point.
Where are the limits of the check?
Actual liability depends on the service role, the specific content, knowledge, response, platform architecture, user communication, country, deadlines and evidence. The check therefore only provides a structured initial orientation.
Interactive questionnaire
Assess your platform case step by step
Answer the following questions. At the end you receive a preliminary risk level, priority, reasons, review points, a list of documents and a copyable short overview.
Preliminary result
Reasons for this assessment
Recommended next review points
Documents worth preparing
Risk and action matrix
Typical platform risks and first review points
| Topic | Typical risk | First review point | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| DSA role analysis | Duties are classified incorrectly or too late. | Clarify the service role, hosting function, platform function, marketplace relevance and EU reach. | Notice-and-action |
| Notice-and-action | Notices of illegal content are handled without structure or documentation. | Review the notice form, review workflow, responsibility, statement of reasons and takedown log. | High |
| Moderation decisions | Removal, suspension or restriction is not justified, not proportionate or not verifiable. | Align the terms rule, statement of reasons, user communication and complaint process. | High |
| Online marketplace | Sellers, fake listings, counterfeit or unsafe products trigger additional duties. | Review trader traceability, product information, GPSR process, blocking logic and recall responsibility. | Very high |
| Reputation and reviews | Unlawful reviews or public conflicts escalate in communication and in proceedings. | Review factual claims, value judgements, evidence, platform notice, injunction strategy and PR line. | High where visible |
| Automated moderation | Faulty filters, scoring or AI decisions lead to transparency, data protection or discrimination risks. | Review logic, human oversight, error correction, complaint channel, data protection and AI Act interfaces. | Elevated to high |
Sensible next steps
Related ITMR checkers and follow-up reviews
Have your platform case assessed legally
If deadlines are running, content is escalating publicly, a moderation decision is being challenged or marketplace duties are unclear, the legal assessment should take place early. Send ITMR the most specific URLs, screenshots, notices, decisions, deadlines and previous communication possible.
Send inquiry to ITMRNote: This checker provides a structured initial orientation and does not replace legal advice. The specific assessment depends on the individual case, the service role, the infringement, the evidence, the response, the deadlines and the platform architecture. How we support platforms with duties and liability questions is explained under Implementing the DSA and in the area of Social media law.